14 results for 'judge:"Taranto"'.
J. Taranto finds that a veteran's appeal from the denial of attorney fees in claims seeking backpay were improperly dismissed since the veterans court relied on an incorrect legal standard in determining which statute to apply. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: May 9, 2024, Case #: 2023-1117, Categories: Veterans, Attorney Fees
J. Taranto finds that the district court improperly ruled in infringement claims concerning a patent for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries because the claim constructions were not contradictory. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: March 6, 2024, Case #: 23-1194, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the court of federal claims properly ruled in claims brought by involuntarily retired members of the Coast Guard because their involuntary retirements were not part of a reduction in force and thus were unlawful. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: March 1, 2024, Case #: 3/1/24, Categories: Employment, Military
J. Taranto finds the lower court properly found no violation in this patent infringement matter. Freshub sued Amazon claiming it infringed on its patents for voice-processing technology, voice technology used in devices such as smart speakers, that when spoken to, can detect words and create shopping lists. A jury found no infringement on the part of Amazon relating to the patents, and rejected Amazon’s assertion that patents of Freshub’s parent company should be declared invalid based on inadequate description. The instant court finds no error in the lower courts determination. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: February 26, 2024, Case #: 22-1391, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the district court improperly ruled in claims concerning a patent for speech recognition services because the court incorrectly construed certain claim terms.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: February 16, 2024, Case #: 22-1939, Categories: Patent
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Taranto finds that the court of federal claims properly ruled in patent claims concerning "doubly transgenic mice with accelerated pathology for Alzheimer's Disease" because the U.S. had a license to practice the patent and have the patent practiced on its behalf. Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: February 9, 2024, Case #: 22-2248, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the court of federal claims improperly dismissed claims brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act because the court applied the wrong standard and must determine whether plaintiff was an employee of the company as defined under the Act. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: January 22, 2024, Case #: 2022-2249, Categories: Employment, Labor
J. Taranto finds that the patent trial and appeal board properly ruled in claims concerning an "apparatus for identifying a single biomolecule" since the board did not err in constructing the claim phrase "identifying a single biomolecule." Affirmed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: January 9, 2024, Case #: 2022-1410, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the district court improperly ruled in patent claims concerning coffee machine portion capsules because the court erred in its construction of the term "barcode." Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: December 26, 2023, Case #: 22-2042, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the trial court improperly ruled in patent infringement claims concerning a system combining devices for "a bus that can operate at a variety of frequencies" because the competitor presented legally insufficient evidence of equivalents. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: December 4, 2023, Case #: 2022-1906, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled in claims concerning a method for implanting and anchoring neurostimulation leads since the board improperly analyzed obviousness. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: July 10, 2023, Case #: 2022-1451, Categories: Patent
J. Taranto finds that the veteran's court improperly declined to change the disability effective date because the veteran would have applied for disability sooner but for threats of court-martial should he reveal information regarding secret testing performed on him with chemical warfare agents. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: June 15, 2023, Case #: 2019-2211, Categories: Veterans, Military
J. Taranto finds that the board of contract appeals improperly ruled for the construction company in a dispute over a contract to perform work in Yellowstone National Park because the board did not rely on facts in the record. Reversed.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: June 6, 2023, Case #: 2021-1837, Categories: Construction, Contract
J. Taranto finds that the patent trial and appeal board improperly ruled in a dispute over "vehicle floor trays" because plaintiff sufficiently pleaded obviousness. Reversed in part.
Court: Federal Circuit, Judge: Taranto, Filed On: June 6, 2023, Case #: 22-1373, Categories: Patent